News

Police cleared of wrongdoing in Surrey suspect's dog bite

  -
— image credit:

A Surrey RCMP officer did nothing wrong when he released his police dog to secure a suspect who was evading arrest last year, according to a review by the Independent Investigations Office of B.C. (IIO)

The incident, in which a 26-year-old man was pursued and held by the dog, took place on Oct. 18, 2013.

On that evening, Surrey RCMP responded to an abandoned 911 call to a neighbourhood near King George Boulevard and 96 Avenue. It was reported an adult male had fled out the balcony door of a home with a woman's phone.

When police arrived, a service dog began to track the suspect, eventually going into a community garden area. Within an hour of arriving the man was located and emergency personnel was called for a dog bite to his lower left leg that later required surgery.

The IIO is responsible for conducting investigations into all police officer-related incidents that result in death or serious harm. In this case, the man's dog bite injuries met the definition of "serious harm."

Four witness police officers and four civilian witnesses were interviewed for the Surrey investigation, and video surveillance from the area was also reviewed.

In the IIO review, chief civilian director Richard Rosenthal said the suspect was hiding in the garden at night, making it difficult for the officer to see his hands or any weapons he may have carried.

"The affected person was being sought for serious violations that warranted the use and deployment of a police service dog," said Rosenthal. "Police communications corroborate that the affected person was actively evading arrest at the time he was confronted by the [officer] and his dog."

Rosenthal said allowing the man to escape could have endangered the female resident of the home and allowed the suspect to "escape responsibility for a potentially serious offence." Grappling with the man alone in the dark would have been dangerous for both the man and officer, Rosenthal added, and may even have resulted in a need to use deadly force.

"I do not consider the subject officer may have committed an offence in relation to his PSD's (police service dog) actions in stopping the affected person from evading arrest," ruled Rosenthal.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

RCMP seeks public help in solving arson
 
Planned park-in on 72 Avenue cancelled
 
Lack of addiction treatment flagged by crime panel
Large tree taken down in 7 hours
 
Door-to-door mail service being eliminated in Mission
 
Missing New West woman surfaces in Quebec
Province OKs TransLink referendum question
 
Trinity Western University in Langley sues law society over law school
 
Federal court denies Burnaby appeal

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.