News

Government MLAs caution port on coal health risk review

More coal trains will roll by White Rock
More coal trains will roll by White Rock's waterfront if a new coal handling facility at Fraser Surrey Docks is approved by Port Metro Vancouver.
— image credit: James MacKinnon

Three BC Liberal MLAs are urging Port Metro Vancouver to work with medical health officers in reassessing human health risks from increased coal shipments to feed a proposed new terminal at Fraser Surrey Docks.

MLAs Gordon Hogg (Surrey-White Rock), Marvin Hunt (Surrey-Panorama) and Scott Hamilton (Delta North) signed a Feb. 25 letter urging the port to ensure a new coal-impact review announced last month is transparent to the “growing number of municipalities and citizens who have expressed reasonable unanswered questions.”

Port authority CEO Robin Silvester last month ordered the review to plug deficiencies in an earlier environmental health assessment but said further findings on health risks won't be referred back to medical health officers for comment ahead of a final decision on the new $15-million coal terminal, which would bring more coal trains through White Rock, Surrey and Delta.

“I am concerned, that without a transparent process involving the medical health officers, that many questions and concerns will go unanswered or not be accepted by a majority of the residents,” the MLAs’ letter states.

They say every reasonable effort must be made to transparently share scientifically significant information if the Fraser Surrey Docks project is to gain a “social licence” from the public.

Hogg said Wednesday he had originally approached Hunt and Hamilton about signing the letter – and conferred with them on the content – because all three are MLAs representing the rail corridor that would be affected by increased coal shipments.

He said the letter wasn’t made public last month because he hadn’t yet checked with the other MLAs to make sure they were OK with publishing it.

“The letter was, first and foremost, to express our concerns to (Port Metro Vancouver),” Hogg said. “It wasn’t something we were trying to do for political reasons.”

Hogg said that over the last year he has received more than 100 emails and messages and met with numerous groups and individuals concerned about the impact of increased coal shipments.

He noted also both provincial health officer Dr. Perry Kendall and Fraser Health chief medical health officer Dr. Paul Van Buynder have said the previous health review for the project “did not meet acceptable standards.”

Hogg said the intent was to endorse Port Metro Vancouver’s call for Fraser Surrey Docks to conduct further health research – and to encourage a review that would measure up to health officers’ requirements – “so that we can stand before the people of our communities and say ‘here’s the results of a robust review.’”

– with files from Alex Browne

 

 

 

 


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Operation Red Nose ready to hit the road for another season
 
Two police officers hospitalized after being rammed by stolen truck in Surrey
 
Two survive fiery Surrey crash
Election 2014: Sole independent school trustee confident about new board
 
Stampeders down Eskimos 43-18 in division final
 
New councillor excited to represent Agassiz
New rules coming for local election spending
 
Rooftop deck raises concern for neighbours of planned White Rock duplex
 
Little Campbell trestle replacement on track

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 20 edition online now. Browse the archives.