Opinion

James said ‘no’ on twinning Port Mann

Desperate attempts by the NDP to re-interpret and re-style the meaning of what Carole James said just aren’t going to work. 

People have been waiting for years for James and the NDP to articulate a policy on the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge, and now they have: The NDP are opposed to twinning the Port Mann Bridge.  James couldn’t have been more clear. 

What part of “no” don’t the NDP understand?  Everyone in B.C. clearly understood what Carole James meant when she said “no” to twinning the Port Mann Bridge. 

I can certainly understand why NDP stalwarts are so freaked out by the NDP’s policy of opposition to the bridge twinning project, and why they’re so desperate to rewrite the history on this one.  It’s because they know the bridge and highway expansion projects are popular and supported by a huge majority of people in the Lower Mainland.  

Re-interpreting and re-styling the meaning of what Carole James said just isn’t going to work for the NDP.

Trudy Gordon, Burnaby

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
Off to school, and back to court for BCTF
 
Hwy 99 interchange opens
 
B.C. teachers, employers reach tentative deal
COLUMN: Enjoy the fleeting moments of parenthood
 
COLUMN: Social media builds trust with police
 
Fire tears through North Delta sawmill
Tensions mount in French port over migrant influx
 
Ingrid Rice
 
Cycling: The determination to keep cycling

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 16 edition online now. Browse the archives.