Opinion

James said ‘no’ on twinning Port Mann

Desperate attempts by the NDP to re-interpret and re-style the meaning of what Carole James said just aren’t going to work. 

People have been waiting for years for James and the NDP to articulate a policy on the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge, and now they have: The NDP are opposed to twinning the Port Mann Bridge.  James couldn’t have been more clear. 

What part of “no” don’t the NDP understand?  Everyone in B.C. clearly understood what Carole James meant when she said “no” to twinning the Port Mann Bridge. 

I can certainly understand why NDP stalwarts are so freaked out by the NDP’s policy of opposition to the bridge twinning project, and why they’re so desperate to rewrite the history on this one.  It’s because they know the bridge and highway expansion projects are popular and supported by a huge majority of people in the Lower Mainland.  

Re-interpreting and re-styling the meaning of what Carole James said just isn’t going to work for the NDP.

Trudy Gordon, Burnaby

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
 
Black Press buys newspapers from Glacier Media
 
Surrey RCMP officer to stand trial on multiple gun charges
COLUMN: Ideas for a non-toy Christmas
 
COLUMN: We must take care of our seniors
 
COLUMN: Growth does not come cheaply
Police search for two teens in Surrey hit-and-run
 
Y walk when you can raise money
 
“Suspicious” Agassiz house fire under investigation

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.