Letters to the Editor

Pipeline benefits

Re: Northern Gateway pipeline recommended for federal approval.

Building a pipeline provides temporary employment, but an alternative exists that offers fewer environmental risks, fewer carbon emissions, and more long-term work for residents of B.C.

If the proposed $6.5-billion expenditure were invested in public transit, building retrofits, and renewable energy, between three and 34 times more jobs would be generated.

In addition, more super-tankers would have a negative impact on commercial fishing and in the Kitimat region. And if a spill occurs, thousands of jobs along the entire coast will be in jeopardy.

Since there is a much better option, why take the risk of toxic spills on our land and water?

 

Larry Kazdan

Vancouver

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Surrey RCMP officer to stand trial on multiple gun charges
 
Medical marijuana users score another win in court
 
Planned park-in on 72 Avenue cancelled
“Suspicious” Agassiz house fire under investigation
 
CP Holiday Train Puts on a Great show in Agassiz
 
Hunters protest shift favouring non-residents
UPDATE: 11th farm hit with Avian flu, outbreak that started in Chilliwack enters U.S.
 
2014 Poppy Campiagn was a big success
 
Carly Rae Jepsen surprises Christmas at the Clarke fans

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.