Letters to the Editor

Pipeline benefits

Re: Northern Gateway pipeline recommended for federal approval.

Building a pipeline provides temporary employment, but an alternative exists that offers fewer environmental risks, fewer carbon emissions, and more long-term work for residents of B.C.

If the proposed $6.5-billion expenditure were invested in public transit, building retrofits, and renewable energy, between three and 34 times more jobs would be generated.

In addition, more super-tankers would have a negative impact on commercial fishing and in the Kitimat region. And if a spill occurs, thousands of jobs along the entire coast will be in jeopardy.

Since there is a much better option, why take the risk of toxic spills on our land and water?

 

Larry Kazdan

Vancouver

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Total crime up 21 per cent so far this year
 
Decade trend shows crime dropping slowly in Surrey
 
First-degree murder charge in 2013 South Surrey homicide
Pirate ship bonds community together
 
Council seeks ways to fund sprinkler installation
 
Shooting on 12th Street
Tipped truck at Teapot
 
Election 21014: Harrison candidates split on parking problem, again
 
Teacher strike cheques in the mail

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.