Letters to the Editor

Pipeline benefits

Re: Northern Gateway pipeline recommended for federal approval.

Building a pipeline provides temporary employment, but an alternative exists that offers fewer environmental risks, fewer carbon emissions, and more long-term work for residents of B.C.

If the proposed $6.5-billion expenditure were invested in public transit, building retrofits, and renewable energy, between three and 34 times more jobs would be generated.

In addition, more super-tankers would have a negative impact on commercial fishing and in the Kitimat region. And if a spill occurs, thousands of jobs along the entire coast will be in jeopardy.

Since there is a much better option, why take the risk of toxic spills on our land and water?

 

Larry Kazdan

Vancouver

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

One last holdup on B.C. railway tracks
 
COLUMN: We must care for our first responders
 
COLUMN: Dealing with secondary suites
Wild winds down trees, cut power
 
‘Iconic’ White Rock artist to be featured in calendar
 
Election 2014: South Surrey ‘family group’ targets pro-gay policy
ARZEENA HAMIR: The insanity of lawn maintenance
 
Richmond could learn from ALR consultation
 
Tolls likely to lead to congestion

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.