Letters to the Editor

Pipeline benefits

Re: Northern Gateway pipeline recommended for federal approval.

Building a pipeline provides temporary employment, but an alternative exists that offers fewer environmental risks, fewer carbon emissions, and more long-term work for residents of B.C.

If the proposed $6.5-billion expenditure were invested in public transit, building retrofits, and renewable energy, between three and 34 times more jobs would be generated.

In addition, more super-tankers would have a negative impact on commercial fishing and in the Kitimat region. And if a spill occurs, thousands of jobs along the entire coast will be in jeopardy.

Since there is a much better option, why take the risk of toxic spills on our land and water?

 

Larry Kazdan

Vancouver

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
9-year-old girl lured from Surrey bedroom and sexually assaulted
 
Junior Jays win Premier league playoff
 
Double stabbing leaves one dead, another man injured
For Bieksa, hockey’s a labour of love
 
Call-in meeting to talk Surrey transit
 
Vintage roadster destroyed in fiery crash
Double the fun as California rider wins twice at Thunderbird Show Park
 
Music in the park
 
Candidate creates election website for Maple Ridge

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Aug 28 edition online now. Browse the archives.