Letters to the Editor

Suite fees not equitable

I was listening to Coun. Barinder Rasode on talk radio trying to justify the added secondary suite fees in Surrey.

I am sick and tired of being blamed for the added drain on city services because I have a secondary suite. Including my tenant, there are two residents in my home. Are you trying to tell me that two people are using double the water and sewer and producing double the garbage than the house next door with eight residents and no suite?

Why is only a house with a suite being penalized for the extra drain on these services? If the extra drain on services really is your main concern, would it not be more equitable to increase the fees on the households that actually do put a drain on the services and not just the household with a suite?

Actual usage should determine the fees charged whether you have a suite or not.

 

Marlene Chernesky

Surrey

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Legal aid gets rare boost for family cases
 
Views split on bigger medical role for firefighters
 
A Quilt for Warm Memories from Cops for Cancer
Stabbing victim not co-operating with police
 
UPDATED with new video link: Final campaign debate features internet and social media
 
Two-year-old Surrey hit and run remains unsolved
Reel Reviews: Actor takes long walk from Mandela
 
Drug-dealing cop gets three-year jail term
 
UPDATE: Man facing multiple charges after Surrey car-jacking

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.