Letters to the Editor

Suite fees not equitable

I was listening to Coun. Barinder Rasode on talk radio trying to justify the added secondary suite fees in Surrey.

I am sick and tired of being blamed for the added drain on city services because I have a secondary suite. Including my tenant, there are two residents in my home. Are you trying to tell me that two people are using double the water and sewer and producing double the garbage than the house next door with eight residents and no suite?

Why is only a house with a suite being penalized for the extra drain on these services? If the extra drain on services really is your main concern, would it not be more equitable to increase the fees on the households that actually do put a drain on the services and not just the household with a suite?

Actual usage should determine the fees charged whether you have a suite or not.

 

Marlene Chernesky

Surrey

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Surrey enforcer killed on the weekend
 
A relationship set in stone
 
Report ranks high spenders among Metro Vancouver cities
Countdown to Christmas... is your home sparkling and bright?
 
North Delta skater sees world with Disney
 
Plenty of Party for the Planet pix
Volunteer fair for youth in Surrey
 
Election 2014: White Rock mayoral candidate likens TV debate to ambush
 
Hikers rescued from Dewdney Mountain

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 21 edition online now. Browse the archives.