Letters to the Editor

Surrey tree preservation gets ‘pathetic lip service’ from current council

My congratulations on a fine “Viewpoint” in the July 17 issue “Kudos for tree huggers,” by Frank Bucholtz.

As a director/treasurer of the Green Timbers Heritage Society (GTHS) and a 28-year volunteer for Surrey heritage, I have seen Surrey go from a rural to a paved community.

Thank you so much for a well-thought-out and clear criticism, pros and cons, of the pitiful lip service the current Surrey council has done for tree preservation.

The greatest weakness in its tree bylaw is that Surrey-owned land is exempt.

The long effort by GTHS to protect/promote the preservation of the “urban forest” is again in jeopardy as once again parcels are cut off for pavement and facilities.

We hope that your Viewpoint will be a catalyst to reawaken the Surrey public to these threats and loopholes, especially in the threats against already set-aside green space.

 

Jim Foulkes

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Gypsy moth infestation discovered in Cloverdale
 
Surrey MLA hits the streets for welfare challenge
 
Election 2014: Surrey school trustee candidates unite
Surrey enforcer killed on the weekend
 
Two Surrey students killed in Delta crash
 
28th annual Toy Run roars through Fraser Valley
Ebola airport checks expand; nurses get training
 
There is no delay in Ebola vaccine: NewLink
 
Railway delays hobble feed mill industry

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 21 edition online now. Browse the archives.