Letters to the Editor

Surrey tree preservation gets ‘pathetic lip service’ from current council

My congratulations on a fine “Viewpoint” in the July 17 issue “Kudos for tree huggers,” by Frank Bucholtz.

As a director/treasurer of the Green Timbers Heritage Society (GTHS) and a 28-year volunteer for Surrey heritage, I have seen Surrey go from a rural to a paved community.

Thank you so much for a well-thought-out and clear criticism, pros and cons, of the pitiful lip service the current Surrey council has done for tree preservation.

The greatest weakness in its tree bylaw is that Surrey-owned land is exempt.

The long effort by GTHS to protect/promote the preservation of the “urban forest” is again in jeopardy as once again parcels are cut off for pavement and facilities.

We hope that your Viewpoint will be a catalyst to reawaken the Surrey public to these threats and loopholes, especially in the threats against already set-aside green space.

 

Jim Foulkes

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Q&A: Ex-transportation ministers criticize referendum, discuss TransLink
 
Woman killed in Newton home
 
Surrey RCMP seek help finding Halloween hit-and-run driver
Operation Red Nose ready to hit the road for another season
 
Two survive fiery Surrey crash
 
Arrests of pipeline protesters in Burnaby signal start of long battle
[UPDATE] High-risk missing woman found
 
Man arrested in stabbing at Surrey elementary school
 
Bell Media announces 80 job cuts

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 20 edition online now. Browse the archives.